Between a rock and an asphalt hard place
For those of you who have missed the news recently, Basildon BC are facing a bit of a tough time from just about every angle as they start the process of physically evicting around 400 travellers from their current site this week. Originally they had planned to send the bailiffs in first thing on Monday morning, although a late court injunction was granted to put this back until at least Friday, and then possibly longer after that.
This is the beginning of the end to a process which began a decade ago, when the Council began trying to move a then-smaller group of travellers on from the site but were unsuccessful. It is difficult to pick some of the facts from the story without coming across as biased towards one viewpoint or another, and not being immersed in the situation we don’t want to say whether one is in fact right or wrong, but it’s worth for a second reflecting on the challenges the Council faces here.
In the first place, they are being pressurised by local people to move this group on. According to their consultation findings, they claim an overwhelming majority of local people want them to take the action that they are now trying to push through, with few arguing for the opposite. If they stood aside and allowed the traveller community to stay on their site then they would be going against the wishes of the pre-existing local community. This of course assumes that good practice principles were followed when undertaking this consultation, but we have to believe that if they hadn’t been then they would have not got as far as they have to date.
They also have many years of planning law and regulations to consider. Over the years, countless buildings and developments will have been proposed to the planning department for a huge variety of structures and potential communities. Some will have been successful, others will have fallen foul and not been allowed. By the looks of things, the travellers have developed the site they are on without going through these processes and/or abiding by the findings of the planning department, carrying on with their own plans regardless.
It has also taken years to get to this stage. The Council will not have been sitting idly by during this time waiting for it all to come to a head before moving in, which makes this last minute reprieve for the travellers a little puzzling. They will have surely been trying to abide by the law and contacting the community to tell them their concerns and the issues which were arising, and looking for an easier, quicker, cheaper solution. To think that years of acriomony and mistrust will be swept aside within a week and an amicable solution reached seems a little too far in the realms of fantasy for me.
Of course, on the other hand they are now being accused by some of being bullies with scant regard for a community’s culture, traditions and way of life. They are being accused of not communicating adequately with the travellers on the site, and being over the top with regards to enforcing the court’s original orders to begin clearing it. They are edging towards being put into the ‘them’ in the ‘them and us’ comparison many neutral observers may take.
On one hand therefore they infuriate local people, on the other they break up a community and simply shunt the perceived problem somewhere else – these travellers are not simply going to disappear of course. And through this whole process they are spending tens of thousands of pounds up to millions on dealing with the situation, depending upon which report you choose to read.
This is a high profile example of the challenges faced every day by local authorities up and down the country. They simply cannot please all of the people all of the time; there is no such thing as a win-win situation, just a minimise-the-negative-impact-as-far-as-possible situation which is played out time and again at every scale. Planning is a simple example; allowing a building might satisfy the developer but not their neighbours, whilst denying it will see their scheme (and existing investments) crumble whilst delighting others.
Local budget setting processes are another ever more prominent version of this battle; cut one service and another may survive, but who is to say which is more valid, important or needed? Once initial fat is trimmed it is only going to become more difficult to make these decisions, and local authorities are looking leaner by the day. And you can be sure that there will be no last minute high court injunction to put off the need for councils to find additional savings.
The situation on Dale Farm is one in which too many people will lose, whatever the outcome. Both sides have painted themselves into a corner, with neither willing to give in nor feeling like they should have to. Indeed, if you hear either party being interviewed they typically claim to have gone out of their way to be helpful, and are willing to abide by the decisions of the courts (assuming the courts agree with them of course).
Overall it is a sad metaphor for situations big and small which challenge officers day in day out, and one which all councils should be looking at and seeing if they can learn from in some way. If one learns more from defeat then from victory, this should indeed be a huge lesson to the travellers, the Council and the country.