Job Evaluation


Jokes about Reindeers are not as funny in June

It’s a guest post day on WLLG. Today’s poster tackles an area of local government that few dare to tread but is becoming increasingly important; the job evaluation process. If you have a post you’d like to add to the blog please drop us a line at welovelocalgovernment@gmail.com but not before you’ve read this excellent post:

It is a truth universally acknowledged that equal pay is a good thing. But pay cuts in the name of equal pay aren’t readily accepted.

Enter the quandary of Job Evaluation.

The 2004 Local Government pay agreement obliged all councils to carry out JE. Roles are assessed and graded on factors including knowledge, mental skills, physical/mental/emotional demands and working conditions.

Some roles stay on existing spinal column points; some increase and some – inevitably –go down. Same is fine, up welcome, but a reduction in scale points, particularly for the low-paid and those at the top of their scale, can cause serious upset.

The mantra of JE is that roles are evaluated, not people. This is a hard fact for those potentially facing a drop in pay, with related effects on salary progression and pensions. While pay protection is usually offered, ranging from months to years, an adverse JE outcome can be a serious blow to individuals’ finances and wellbeing.

The process is also fiendishly complicated; with each HR department jealously guarding its latest copy of the ‘Hay’ and ‘GLPC’ guidance (no-one is entirely sure what these are or how they work). This does not help the staff who lose out as the reasoning (“the JD received less points than needed”) is often quite opaque.

Those worst affected attack the JE process, unable to understand how the job they’ve been doing for years has suddenly dropped three grades on the back of a new job description. They question the motivation behind it and then begin updating their CV – often hunting for the same slim opportunities as their colleagues.

Unions are normally involved at every step, and strike ballots and action can and have been called. But without JE councils may prolong inequality and leave themselves open to equal pay claims.

Rock? Or hard place?

Add frozen cost-of-living increments and ever-present changes to pensions and it’s not a great time to be at a job evaluating council.

Equal pay is a cause worth striving for. Unfortunately good principles are not always easy to put into practice.

The Job Evaluation process is necessary but has it become a necessary evil?

Welovelocalgovernment is a blog written by UK local government officers. If you have a piece you’d like to submit or any comments you’d like to make please drop us a line at: welovelocalgovernment@gmail.com

About these ads
Explore posts in the same categories: We love the Council

Tags: , , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

2 Comments on “Job Evaluation”

  1. hemp Says:

    scrap the hundreds of process targets Labour have imposed on councils .14. Significant local projects like new housing estates will have to be designed through a collaborative process that has involved the neighbourhood..29.


  2. [...] restructure brings a fight over job grading and when there’s a fight over job grading theUnion are called in to try and write a new JD that [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 241 other followers

%d bloggers like this: