Doing things the ‘easy’ way

It's not easy being George...

A guest post from one of our private sector friends today… Enjoy

Cuts season is upon us and much like a high street hooker showing a bit of leg George Osborne is warming us up for the upcoming massacre of public services by flashing us a small hint of the good stuff that is to come.

Yesterday David Cameron talked welfare reform (handily delayed until 2013) but this morning George Osborne announced his first cut of October (many more to come).

For those who missed it George Osborne announced that Child Benefit would no longer be paid to households where one member of the household earned over £44,000.

As the BBC helpfully explained:

He (Mr Osborne) confirmed the cut would hit homes with a single or two high earners (as in over £44,000) but families with two parents on incomes up to £44,000 – which might add up together to over £80,000 – would keep the benefit.

So a couple earning up to £82K a year could receive child benefits, yet a single parent earning a little over £44K (and paying more tax than a couple) would not… When asked whether his policy was fair, Mr Osborne’s response was that it may not be fair, but it’s the easiest way to do it.

So, with the comprehensive spending review almost upon us – and the axe about to fall on many of our services and benefits, I got to thinking…..if Mr Osborne is using the ‘is it easy’ test when deciding which public services to cut what can we expect from the CSR?

When reviewing healthcare spending, will he look at the cost of servicing our increasing obesity problem and suggest that we apply a weight limit for NHS care? Yes, it will massively discriminate against a vulnerable portion of our population and some obesity needs addressing medically whereas other needs a good trip to the gym but diagnosis is expensive and weighing people at the front door of hospitals is much easier.

What about education? Should we just abolish year 5? That would cut the money pretty quick. Yeah, there would be a problem for parents and carers and we’d have to make teachers redundant but surely that is a much easier option than re-negotiating pay deals and dealing with the ensuing strikes?

And local government, well that really is easy – we’ll just half the number of councils: That’ll save on senior management (Eric Pickles will be pleased) and we could sell some of the buildings. And who needs democratic accountability anyway; getting rid of half the councils is definitely easier than working out where real savings could be delivered.

Transport is even easier: We’ll just stop paying for A roads and close the airports in the Midlands; those people can get north or south anyway.

The fact is, public spending is more complicated than that….and if it was that ‘easy’ we wouldn’t be in the current financial dire straits. Basic issues of fairness and equity will prevent Mr Osborne for implementing his child benefit policy. I just hope he thinks a bit more sensibly when it comes to the rest of public spending or we could be in real trouble.

Explore posts in the same categories: Big P Politics, The future of Local Govt

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

5 Comments on “Doing things the ‘easy’ way”

  1. localgovaswell Says:

    Is this not the disease of the Tory Party right now; looking for easy and quick solutions rather than overall solutions to problems. One of my colleagues criticised Eric Pickles for doing something similar with the Audit Commission here:

  2. localgov Says:


    I definitely think it’s an overly simplified system that has that very basic, very obvious flaw that people will cling to and attack, but what are we missing?

    Often when I submit a report with recommendations I throw in at least one if not two unrealistic or poor recommendations which can be dismissed out of hand, leaving those which I actually want to see followed through. That way my boss feels important and I get my points across – everyone’s a winner.

    Is this the equivalent ploy – they’ll offer this up to draw the flak, whilst sliding something else in under the radar?

    Oh, and calling it a disease may be a little harsh… problem perhaps, but when has overzealousness been a disease?

  3. […] In light of this we have tried our best to treat Eric Pickles and the coalition with a sort of equanimity; taking the rough with the smooth and not getting too uppity about either. (For evidence of this see our discussion of the Audit Commission abolition and CSR and for evidence of the opposite see a guest post on the Child Benefit changes. […]

  4. […] to post pieces as diverse as a discussion of performance indicators, George Osborne’s Child Benefit changes and the salami slice. We hope to see many more in the New […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: