A ‘Pay Freeze’ which doesn’t freeze pay


We live in a time of austerity and many pretty tough steps are going to have to be taken to get through it.

We may all disagree about the scale of the problem or the necessity of quick cuts but in general most sentient human beings (Bob Crowe is, in my humble opinion, neither) acccept that some cuts will be needed.

With this in mind the salaries of public sector workers seem to be a relatively controversy free place to start. This is not because local government workers are necessarily overpaid (more discussion on that another day) or because they are an easy target (see Eric Pickles) but because cutting salaries spreads the pain on lots of people and doesn’t lead to a reduced service.

Thus, in George Osborne’s first budget he announced a pay freeze for those on salaries over £21,500 and a relatively small increase for everyone else. This doesn’t apply to local Government but we had a freeze last year and undoubtedly will have one again; however…

Joe Bloggs on the street would believe that a pay freeze meant that a member of staff being paid £25,000 in year 1 would be paid £25,000 in year 2. Not so.

In fact local government employees operate on a scale system with so called ‘spinal points’. Each year employees automtically go up one spinal point with a maximum of five available without promotion. Assuming that most staff receive a promotion every five years or so this means that nearly everyone’s pay is rising every year (this is a bit disingenuous as some older staff have done the same job for many years; however, it’s amazing how many now have the word senior in their title and thus accessed another five years or autoincreases). The rise is obviously not as much as they would have without the pay freeze but it’s going up anyway.

It’s not that I’m against pay rises or performance related pay, or even salaries reflecting organisational knowledge and skills picked up through longevity, it’s just that surely a pay freeze should mean just that; a freeze on pay. The risk is that by allowing the system to continue as it does the impact of the freeze is lessened and then we have to make more cuts that we would have previously which surely is in no-one’s interest.

L

Explore posts in the same categories: The future of Local Govt

6 Comments on “A ‘Pay Freeze’ which doesn’t freeze pay”

  1. localgov Says:

    Whenever unions talk of low offers with regards to pay rises (I’m thinking teachers, nurses and other vital services) they always use the approach that a pay rise that isn’t in keeping with inflation (however that’s measured) is actually a pay cut in real terms.

    Isn’t a total pay freeze as you described in effect a pay cut for staff?

  2. localgovaswell Says:

    It is a pay cut in inflation terms but possibly only just. Surely the idea of a pay freeze is to actually freeze pay, inflict a little pain on the staff and ensure everyone survives… A pay freeze that doesn’t do so is just a fake!

  3. Love Local Gov 2 Says:

    Hi, Just found this blog and it’s brilliant, thank you.

    Just to add, not all Local Gov staff have automatic progression through incremental points. Some Authorities operate local pay arrangements/systems so for these staff a ‘freeze’ really means a ‘freeze’ and it’s cold out there (who mentioned the snow), if you have been at the top of your grade for a number of years, have pay frozen, with increased pension contributions and reductions in benefits e.g. car allowance. I understand the economic necessity and still love local gov, but please let’s show it’s not ‘cushy’ working in the public sector.


    • A good point well made. I think the point I was trying to make was that we should all be in this together. If we are going to go for a blanket pay freeze then we should do just that; make it a blanket freeze for all staff and not let increments etc effect that.

      That being said; I would still rather there was no pay freeze at all.

      Thanks for the comments; much appreciated.


  4. […] 7)      Service managers start muttering darkly about those ‘bloody increments’ […]


  5. […] local government pay (quel surprise). This one was about local government pay increments, a topic we have discussed in the past. Here, the Mail ‘discovered’ that: The survey of 188 councils shows that a […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: