The Freedom of ‘Lazy Journalism’ Act


Freedom to stencil

In the publicity surrounding his recently published memoir ‘A Journey’ Tony Blair was asked if there was anything he regretted from his time in office. Cleverly dodging the obvious answer, ‘Iraq’, our former Prime Minister surprised the watching masses by answering: ‘The Freedom of Information Act’.

Those watching probably responded to this with a big yawn but Mr Blair was 100% right: the FOI Act drives many of us to distraction.

I’m not going to get into the morality of the issue; I personally believe that the more information in the public realm the better but for Local Government staff the morality of the issue is basically besides the point; practically it is a nightmare.

The real problem is that many of the requests we receive are not from concerned citizens but from seriously lazy and, dare I say, incompetent journalists. Not all journalists are lazy or incompetent and some who use the FoI Act do so with devastating effectiveness.

However, there are another category and they are just a drain on the public purse.

These so-called ‘journalists’ waste hours of council time (ironically often searching for examples of council staff wasting their time) and never are they actually searching for information or investigating a story.

Instead, they pre-write their stories and then use the FoI Act to trawl for a fact or two that will justify their prejudices or exaggerations.

Friends and colleagues have moaned to me about this for ages and so a few weeks ago I asked some of them to send me examples from their authorities of this lazy journalism. In the tradition of FoI I’ve copied some of these below… See if you can guess the story:

  • Please provide the number of Diversity Officers employed by the council
  • Please provide the total annual cost of Diversity Officers in 2009/10. This should include, but is not restricted to, salaries, expenses, pensions, travel costs and other remuneration.
  • Please provide details of the number of staff with the terms “climate change” or “global warming” in their job title or job description.

a)     The job titles and job descriptions for each staff member included above

b)    The total cost of staff with “climate change” or “global warming” in their job title or job description. This should include, but is not restricted to, salaries, expenses, pensions, travel costs and other remuneration.

  • Has the council made any arrangements or been alerted to arrangements made by the registry office  which allows registry office staff to opt out of performing civil partnerships on religious grounds
  • Was any same sex couple refused a civil partnership on premises run by the local registry office because individual registrars refused to preside over the service.   Can you please state on how many occasions this happened?
  • Has the organisation encouraged employees to attend any workshops and or training courses and or role playing sessions designed to improve their understanding of equality and or diversity and or inclusion issues.
  • Does the council keep documentation which outlines the  rules governing  the flying of flags and or the number of occasions where flags have been flown
  • Can the council please state on how many occasions it has flown the ‘Union Jack’ flag.    Can it please provide a list of occasions when the Union Jack has been flown.   If the council has never flown the Union Jack during this period could it please explain why
  • What is the current highest weekly and or monthly level of housing benefit currently being paid to a claimant and or their landlord?
  • I am writing to obtain details of the amount of money spent on refreshments. This would include things such as snacks, alcohol and biscuits that are given for free to councillors before or after meetings. It would also include instances where food and drink was provided for entertaining purposes. It would nottherefore include cases where food was brought in to be sold
  • Under the Freedom of Information Act, please can you tell me whether your council has undergone a “rebranding” exercise since 1st January, 2007?
    If so, please provide the costs and a brief summary of the exercise.
  • The number of staff employed by your local authority in any of the following roles:
    climate change officer / worker / champion,
    global warming officer / worker / champion,
    carbon emissions officer / worker / champion
    low carbon officer / worker / champion
    carbon offsetting officer / worker / champion
    sustainability officer / worker / champion

These are just a small selection of what I’ve been sent from a very small sample size. Anyone want to guess what stories followed from these FoI requests?

I’ve also asked my colleagues to nominate the laziest, and most time wasting, journalists. I’ll try and collate something for later in the week; if anyone has any to add to this list please do comment below or drop me an e-mail at: welovelocalgovernment@gmail.com

About these ads
Explore posts in the same categories: We love the Council

Tags: , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

8 Comments on “The Freedom of ‘Lazy Journalism’ Act”

  1. FormerLG Says:

    My favourite is the latest category, the freedom of (or more aptly ‘from’) student research category!

    Yep, its those buggers who clearly don’t have the balls to ring you up, so get the FOI to do their research for them.

    Argh!

  2. Suzy Says:

    Agree with the annoyance at lazy, prejudged journalism, and with the student research element (see here for an example of both: http://network.civilservicelive.com/pg/blog/MattRoss/archive/1283295600/1285887600.

    However, I do feel I should add in the sake of balance that councils can use FOI to their advantage in the news stakes, or at least that is what this blog is suggesting…

    http://meejalaw.com/2010/10/08/fobbing-off-with-foi/

  3. Diligent hack Says:

    Guess the story? Answer: Taxpayer Alliance report ‘revealing’ how councils spend £41m on “unnecessary jobs”. http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/bettergovernment/2010/10/new-tpa-research-council-spending-unnecessary-jobs.html

    So, lazy pressure group researchers, not bone idle journalists. Though the latter did, of course, happily copy and paste the ‘research’ for their readers.


  4. [...] the information was garnered using the ‘powers in the Freedom of Information Act’, or a FoI request to you and I. Basically, the geniuses of Channel 4 seem to have sent out a long stream of FoI [...]


  5. [...] few weeks ago I wrote a post decrying the sad state of a part of our great British media and in particular their favourite tool of laziness; the [...]


  6. [...] It seems like a lifetime ago that I sat at my computer and drafted a post entitled: ‘The Freedom of Lazy Journalism Act.’ [...]


  7. [...] been known to have our differences with the Freedom of Information Act but even when we’re faced with yet more stupid requests [...]


  8. [...] not much really, frankly we deserve more.  We also expected a bit of backlash when we had a pop at lazy journalists, going so far as to name our top three FOI-ers, but happily it was the good ones who actually read [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 241 other followers

%d bloggers like this: